One of my favorite American professional wrestlers is Mick Foley, aka Cactus Jack, aka Mankind. In his first book, titled “Have a Nice Day: A Tale of Blood and Sweatsocks” (which was a New York Times best seller!), he talked about wrestling being “fake”.
In essence, it is fake, in that outcomes are predetermined, and they’re not actually out to harm each other. The wrestlers plan their moves, and communicate throughout the match to make sure that the action flows towards a logical conclusion. Of course, the reality is that jumping off of steel cages onto the Spanish announcer’s table 20 feet below does take its toll on the body. The physical abuse is not fake. But I digress….
In describing that, Foley expressed a thought that struck me as being quite applicable to scale modeling. He talked about his goal was to get the audience to “suspend their disbelief”. Intuitively everyone watching knows that it is all fake drama, made up storylines, etc. But the wrestlers job is to get them to look past that, if only for a moment, so the audience suspends their disbelief, and simply enjoys the show. (Assuming you’re a fan of professional wrestling, or, in my vernacular, “rasslin”.)
I think the same idea can apply to modeling.
Generally, all modelers are in some way striving to make their work appear like the real thing, or in some cases, look like a real thing (as in scifi, etc.). Even when the methods of interpretation vary, the goal is the same. The modeller wants to “sell” the idea that the object being viewed has a genuine quality to it, that it is the real thing.
Now, making a small-scale object appear to look exactly as the 1/1 object does is difficult. The viewer knows it’s a small, plastic (or resin, or whatever) object. They know it is not the real thing.
So we use various techniques that invite the viewer to suspend their disbelief that what they are seeing is actually just a plastic toy. And just like wrestlers have different styles and approaches, so do modelers. Some are more over the top, some are more subtle. But the goal of any style or technique is to “invite” the viewer into the world of the object, and in some way, experience it as if it were the real thing.
Quite often modelers debate the merits of a particular style over another, often vigorously so. But I really believe the mature modeller will step back and appreciate the variety of methods that other modelers use in the quest for “suspense of disbelief” – and then learn from them – and apply them. (Or not, as the case may be.)
Is it always realistic? Well, none of it is, really, in the very strictest sense. The realities of part molding, paint application, scale, light, and so many other factors mean that any efforts we put forth are simply attempts at realism, based on how the creator of the model sees things at the time, and how they want their audience to perceive the final result. One person may look at it and say “that’s not realistic at all”, while another looks and says “wow – that is awesome!” In a strict sense, both are right – and wrong – at the same time.
What is the old saying – “beauty is in the eye of the beholder?” I suppose the same could be said for realism.
In my own personal viewing of other’s modeling efforts, I’ve found it is quite more enjoyable to simply view the model for what it is – an interpretation. That notion cuts across skill levels, genres, and styles. Sure, I may intuitively know that some part of the craft involved could have been better. (Or that it was executed better than I can!) Yet to simply give the creator the benefit of the doubt, and see their work in light of how they are trying to “sell” it, has made me enjoy the variety of work displayed much more. (And I think it has made me a tad less grumpy, too… :D)
Still, I’ve always wondered what it would look like if you could go back in time, take a real World War II airplane for example, hit it with a shrink ray, and size it down to 1/48, 1/32, or whatever scale, and sit it on a table at a show. I am quite certain that some folks would love it, and others would not.
And if it were an AVG P-40B, someone would certainly say “that underside color is completely wrong…. 😉
Leave a Reply